Hamilton Court FX

Hamilton Court FX

Pillar 3

Part A: INTRODUCTION

Part B: RISK GOVERNANCE

Part C: GOVERNANCE AND OVERSIGHT FRAMEWORK

Part D: REMUNERATION

Part E: CODE STAFF AND LINK BETWEEN PAY AND PERFORMANCE

PART A: INTRODUCTION

Regulatory Context

The Capital Requirements Regulation (575/2013) (“CRR”) and the CRD IV Directive (2013/36/EU) (“CRD”) establish a regulatory capital framework across Europe governing the amount and nature of capital that investment firms must maintain. In the United Kingdom, this framework of legislation is supplemented by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) rules in the Prudential Sourcebook for Investment Firms (“IFPRU”).

The capital framework applicable to investment firms consists of three “Pillars”:

  • Pillar 1 sets out the minimum capital amount that meets the Firm’s credit, market and operational risk;
  • Pillar 2 requires the Firm to assess whether its Pillar 1 capital is adequate to meet its risks and is subject to annual review by the FCA; and
  • Pillar 3 requires disclosure of specified information about the underlying risk management controls, capital position and remuneration.

Part Eight of the CRR (Articles 431-455) define the provisions for Pillar 3 disclosure. This  document has been produced by Hamilton Court FXLLP (the “Firm”) to meet its Pillar 3 disclosure obligations.  The document is informed by the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (“ICAAP”) which is kept under review and subject to a formal annual revision and internal approval.

Scope and Application of Directive Requirements

The requirements of Part Eight of the CRR apply to the Firm. Hamilton Court FX LLP (The Firm) is incorporated in the UK and is authorised and regulated by the FCA (with reference number [628267]) as an IFPRU Limited Licence €125K Firm with permissions to undertake certain regulated investment activities on behalf of professional and retail clients.

The Firm is not a significant IFPRU firm. This Pillar 3 disclosure is made by the Firm on a solo basis.

Frequency of Disclosure

The Firm will be making Pillar 3 disclosures at least annually, subject to its ongoing assessment that such disclosures do not need to be made even more frequently due to the characteristics of the Firm’s business.

The disclosures will be as at the Accounting Reference Date, which is the last day of the calendar year, and any figures included in this document will be based on the audited accounts as at that date. The disclosures will be published in conjunction with the date of publication of the financial statements.

Location of Disclosure

The disclosure will also be published on the Firm’s website.

Verification

The information contained in this document has not been audited by the Firm’s external auditors and does not constitute any form of financial statement and must not be relied upon in making any judgement on the Firm. The Pillar 3 disclosures have been reviewed and approved by the Board.

Materiality & Confidentiality

If the Firm deems a certain disclosure to be immaterial, it may omit the disclosure from this document.[1] The Firm regards information provided in disclosures as “material” if its omission or misstatement could change or influence the assessment or decision of a user relying on that information for the purpose of making economic decisions.

Investment firms may also omit items of information where they believe that those items include information that is proprietary or confidential. The Firm regards information as “proprietary” if sharing that information with the public would undermine the Firm’s competitive position. Proprietary information may include information on products or systems which, if shared with competitors, would render the Firm’s investments less valuable. The Firm regards information as “confidential” if there are obligations to customers or other counterparty relationships binding the Firm to confidentiality.

The Firm has made no omissions on the grounds that certain information is immaterial, proprietary or confidential, other than as may be disclosed in the statutory accounts.

PART B: RISK GOVERNANCE

The Firm is committed to good risk management – this is prioritised through operational structure, governance processes, monitoring and reporting activities. The senior management of the Firm are committed to best practices in governance and oversight.

The Firm is also committed to maintaining an effective internal control structure which includes oversight, monitoring and reporting of risks.

The Firm’s risk governance policies are designed to provide objective assessments and monitoring of risks through independent lines of reporting for risk oversight and operations. On-going risk reporting ensures the Board and senior management are provided with risk management information concerning the Firm’s risk exposure. This information also forms part of the Firm’s ICAAP.

Management regularly reviews the level of risk it regards as appropriate in order to operate within its regulatory obligations and achieve its business objectives.

Risk Management Framework

Risk management within the Firm is based on a ‘three lines of defence’ model, as follows:

  • first line of defence: business management and staff are responsible for (i) identifying and assessing the risks faced in the business and (ii) ensuring that appropriate controls are established and maintained;
  • second line of defence: the Compliance and Finance teams are responsible for establishing an effective policy framework for the business and conducting compliance monitoring; and
  • third line of defence: the external audit and the Firm’s Board provide independent and objective oversight of the effectiveness of the risk management, control and governance processes. The Firm does not have an internal audit function therefore this activity is outsourced to third parties who report directly to the Board on specific items at the Board’s request.

The Firm is committed to on-going review and development of all three lines of defence in line with its businesses scale and risk profile.

The Firm’s Board meets at least four times a year. The Board is comprised of members and non-executive directors, with at least one independent non-executive director.

Risk Appetite

The Firm has developed systems and controls to mitigate certain risks. This ensures those risks remain within the appetite of its risk program, as defined by the Finance team and approved by the Firm’s Board.

The Firm sets its risk appetite by considering material risks in the business and then evaluates the level of acceptable risk (either subjective or objective) and the related measurements. Any risk exceeding the risk appetite will be reported to the Board along with the proposed action plan to bring the risk back within tolerance.

For those key risks which cannot be mitigated sufficiently, the residual financial risk is quantified and included in the ICAAP Pillar 2 assessment such that additional capital may be held to resolve any risk event which may occur.

Key Risk Categories

The Firm considers its operations to be prudent and risk averse. The prime business objectives of the Firm are:

  • achieving client satisfaction and
  • ensuring the financial strength of the Firm over a long term, as opposed to prioritising rapid growth or returns.

Whilst the Firm is exposed to risks inherent in its business and activities, it has put in place risk management policies, practices and reporting for each category of risk it is exposed to.

The following inherent risks have been identified and analysed for their impact on the Firm:

Credit Risk

HCFX’s credit risk process aims to fully assess and map the potential risks associated with offering forms of credit to clients. The firm accepts that the offering of credit is a tool which can benefit the firm in attracting new business and in assisting the maintenance of existing client relationships, however also notes that credit exposure from clients when not properly managed can undermine the firms stability. HCFX Seeks to balance the convenience and benefits of offering credit with those risks, and seeks to mitigate those risks through oversight and management.

The prime responsibility for managing the firms credit exposure will sit with the firm’s Chief Financial Officer who provides weekly information on the firms current credit position and exposures.

The Firm’s main exposure to credit risk comes from the extension of margin credit and the potential subsequent default by its clients. Consequently, the Firm carries out initial and on-going due diligence on clients, including an assessment of their credit risk. Credit is extended on a per client basis, based on need and trading vintage.

Credit risk exposure is therefore considered as a “Medium” risk and will be mitigated by process controls such as reporting and monitoring credit management. A provision is available and has been considered as part of the firms CVA calculate that, if necessary, allows for certain credit risk events to funded from the Firm’s capital and liquidity provisions.

Market Risk 

Market risk is the risk of loss due to adverse changes in the financial markets, where such changes have not been properly accounted for and hedging strategies are not in place.

The Firm does not trade on its own account and does not book trades unless it has established a counterparty able to deliver funds and so exposure is limited. However, capital market fluctuations can have an effect on client activity and on the Firm’s counterparties.

The Firm’s revenue will be impacted by overall market performance and prices due to decreasing sales. However, a comparison of historical market movements against revenue has shown that the impact on the Firm is less than actual market movements. This is because instability in markets often results in clients seeking more security, thus increasing the utilisation of hedging products which may counteract the reduction in spot FX trading.

On this basis, market risk is mitigated through the pricing structure and a diversified underlying client base. This is coupled with all HCFX being placed directly with counterparties, as opposed to trading on our own book and creating our own exposure.

HCFX also retains its own profits, allowing it to accumulate a capital buffer which allows it to avoid market risks impacting its business. On this basis market exposure is considered low risk.

Settlement Risk

The Firm does not offer contractual settlement credit to customers and works on a “cleared funds only” basis, resulting in limited settlement risk. A small settlement risk, resulting from FX market movements, will occur where trade obligations are not fulfilled by clients.  The Firm operates as a matched principal and settlement risk is mitigated contractually as far as possible.

HCFX has controls in place to close out positions as soon as possible following a default event by a client. HCFX also operates margining provisions on clients who enter into FX derivatives.

Settlement risk and calculation of counterparty risk is also considered as part of the firms ongoing CVA calculations.

Operational Risk

The Firm does not run a trading book or take proprietary positions so it is not required to calculate operational risk under the FCA’s rules. Instead, the fixed overhead requirement acts as a proxy for the Pillar 1 capital. The firms fixed costs are calculated using a CVA calculation process.

Notwithstanding this, the Firm has implemented a risk management framework to remove or mitigate the risks inherent in its business and associated with operational errors, including administrative errors, process failures, loss of IT services, and the competence and negligence of employees. This recognises that operational risk is a significant risk area within the Firm if not carefully managed.

The Firm uses its Finance & Compliance monitoring team to reinforce and oversee the operation of these controls and the risk framework. If required, third parties may also be engaged to undertake independent reviews as a third line of defence.

The operational risk framework, put in place to mitigate operational risks, includes  regular reporting to the board from senior management and heads, as well as an active engagement in the firms operations from the board who maintain active positions inside of the firm.

Error reporting, reaction and management interventions will be  utilised to ensure root cause and preventative actions are investigated and implemented promptly by the Firm. The Board is satisfied that all foreseeable operational risks can be mitigated by process controls and, where necessary, residual risks can be funded from capital provisions under the Pillar 2 assessment.

PART C: GOVERNANCE AND OVERSIGHT FRAMEWORK

The Board is the Governing Body of the Firm. It meets at least quarterly and is composed of executive and non-executive directors.

The Firm has a remuneration committee (“RemCo”) to agree remuneration policy and approve staff remuneration. This meets at least two times a year.

The management of the firm is led by 9 officers and a Non Executive Director. Across this group, the individuals hold a total of 46 directorships, including those held with HCFX.

Recruitment of the senior team is handled though the firms recruitment policy, which managed the hiring of senior staff members. Members of the management team are formed of senior staff inside of the firm, each holding a different position inside of the firm (CEO, CFO, CTO etc) as required. This ensures a broad and wide selection of senior management presence.

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND REQUIREMENTS

Own Funds

The internal capital required to be held against the Firm’s Pillar 1 Own Funds Requirement is £2,436,000, which represents the Variable Capital RWE Own Funds requirement (as defined in the FCA’s rules).

This is the figure that the Board has assessed as satisfactory to meet the requirement and is believed to be sufficient to cover all risks identified.

As at 31 March 2018 (For financial year 2017-2018) the Firm held audited “Common Equity Tier 1” capital of £5,586,940.

HCFX total Regulatory Capital is in excess of the Own Funds Requirement. This surplus, along with liquidity, is monitored by the Finance department and is reported regularly to the Board to ensure that the Firm has sufficient capital and liquidity to meet its regulatory requirements at all times. Any potential future failures will be identified in the projected budgets and addressed internally in advance of any actual breaches. HCFX Shall take into account those risks, as defined in Article 92(3) of the CRR, including Own Funds Requirements, Position Risk, Settlement Risk, Exposure risk and Commodities risk.

PART D: REMUNERATION

In accordance with the CRR’s remuneration disclosure requirements and the FCA’s “General Guidance on Proportionality: The Remuneration Code (SYSC 19A) & Pillar 3 Disclosures on Remuneration”,[2] as an IFPRU limited licence firm, the Firm falls within “proportionality level 3”. It is required to provide the following disclosures regarding its remuneration policy and practices for those categories of staff whose professional activities have a material impact on its risk profile.

The Firm has established a remuneration policy and a RemCo in accordance with the FCA’s Remuneration Code for IFPRU firms at SYSC 19.

The RemCo comprises two members and one non-executive director of the Firm and meets twice per financial year. The RemCo is responsible for establishing, implementing and maintaining remuneration policies, procedures and practices that are consistent with and promote sound and effective risk management. In particular, RemCo is responsible for ensuring the Firm’s compliance with the FCA’s Remuneration Code, as well as other applicable laws and regulations. It reports its findings and recommendations to the Board. No external consultant has been used for the determination of the remuneration policy.

The HCFX Remuneration policy operates a graded trailing pay-out structure, such that commissions owed to staff are paid out over the course of 2 to 3 years depending on trade type, with the final payment to take place post trade completion.

PART E: Code Staff and Link Between Pay and Performance

The Firm classifies those staff whose professional activities have a material impact on its risk profile as Code Staff[3] in line with the FCA’s Remuneration Code. The firm has classified eight individuals as Code Staff in the financial year 2017-2018. The aggregate remuneration paid to the Firm’s Code Staff during the financial year ending on 31 March 2018 was £2,299,315. Of this amount, £594,425 represents fixed salaries, and £1,704,890 represents bonus or commission based income.

Remuneration comprised base salary, pension contributions and benefits in kind. Bonuses were paid to Code Staff in the period in keeping with the Firm’s remuneration policy. It is currently HCFX policy to pay remuneration on a tiered and delayed basis in order to ensure trades are made which are beneficial to the firm long term. Remuneration is determined on a monthly basis, with its prime basis for calculation being on performance, with performance being the total volume and value of trades placed. In determining remuneration, the RemCo considers the individual and the Firms performance. Certain Code staff identified are primarily sales led, and are remunerated based on sales targets. Senior management and control staff bonuses are based primarily on firm performance.

Individuals’ performance is measured against documented and agreed objectives. There is no minimum pay increase and no contractual bonuses for current Code Staff.

[1] Article 432 – Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 575•/•2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013

[2] Article 450 of CRR.

[3] Regulation (EU) 604/2014 of 4 March 2014

“The following disclosures were made by Hamilton Court FX LLP in 2018 and were correct at the time of publication. Hamilton Court Foreign Exchange Limited has assumed all assets and liabilities in respect of Hamilton Court FX LLP, and so these disclosures remain accurate despite the change of legal status”